Rapid Column Screening for Chiral Separation by Parallel SFC

February 6, 2025

Introduction

Supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) is being increasingly used for the separation and purification of optical isomers (chiral substances) because it is faster than high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), reduces the consumption of organic solvents and simplifies post-processing. SFC allows optimum conditions to be identified by automatically varying the type of column (column screening) and the composition of the modifier solvents, thus facilitating optical isomer separation on an analytical scale. After confirming that separation can be achieved on an analytical scale, the SFC system can be scaled up to allow preparative purification. Since SFC is faster and more environmentally friendly than HPLC, it has been widely used for drug discovery by many various pharmaceutical companies, due to stricter regulations on the use and disposal of organic solvents.

There are two methods used for column screening in SFC. In the first, the desired measurement column is selected by switching valves before and after the column. The second is a parallel method in which the flow path is branched at a manifold and the mobile phase and the sample are pumped into several columns simultaneously. The latter allows several measurements to be performed simultaneously, resulting in shorter analysis times.

In this application note, we describe an example of the separation of flavanone, which is a chiral substance, using the parallel SFC system.

Experimental

<Instruments>
CO2 pump:  PU-4386
Modifier pump:  PU-4086*
Heater:  HE-02
Heater Controller:  HC-4068-01
Autosampler:  AS-4350
Column oven:  CO-4060*
UV detector:  UV-4075* x 4
BP regulator:  BP-4340
* with option units

<SFC Conditions>
Column:   CHIRALPAK IA, IB, IC, ID *  (4.6 mmI.D. x 150 mmL, 5 µm)
Eluent A:   Carbon dioxide
Eluent B:  Acetonitrile, methanol
Flow  rate:  Eluent A; 8.0 mL/min, Eluent B; 3.0 mL/min
Column temp.:   40 ºC
Wavelength:   250 nm
Back pressure:  15 MPa
Inj. volume:   10 µL
Sample:   1 mg/mL flavanone in methanol
* CHIRALPAK is a trademark or registered mark of Daicel Corporation.

<Structures>

<Schematic Diagram>

 

Keywords

SFC, chiral substance, column screening, CHIRALPAK, UV detector

Results

Figure 1 shows chromatograms of flavanone obtained using the parallel SFC system.

Fig. 1   Chromatograms of flavanone obtained using the parallel SFC system (at UV 250 nm)

Acetonitrile and methanol were used as modifier solvents and both gave separation results within 4 min. The results show that for both solvents, racemic forms of flavanone could be separated on CHIRALPAK IA and ID columns. For CHIRALPAK IA, the peaks were eluted with a shorter retention time when using acetonitrile than when using methanol, but the opposite results were obtained for CHIRALPAK ID. The reproducibility of the retention times and the peak areas on CHIRALPAK IA and ID columns when using acetonitrile and methanol are shown in Tables 1 to 4.

Table 1   Reproducibility of measurement results obtained using parallel SFC system (modifier solvent: acetonitrile, column: CHIRALPAK IA)

Number of injections Flavanone 1 Flavanone 2
tR [min] Peak area tR [min] Peak area
1 1.627 1232807 2.046 1232651
2 1.633 1258190 2.045 1248113
3 1.617 1241883 2.029 1240881
4 1.624 1241476 2.039 1230797
5 1.627 1258181 2.040 1246964
Ave. 1.626 1246507 2.040 1239881
SD 0.005 10071 0.006 7124
RSD [%] 0.320 0.808 0.296 0.575

Table 2   Reproducibility of measurement results obtained using parallel SFC system (modifier solvent: acetonitrile, column: CHIRALPAK ID)

Number of injections Flavanone 1 Flavanone 2
tR [min] Peak area tR [min] Peak area
1 2.177 1231384 3.309 1231448
2 2.176 1255521 3.288 1253962
3 2.157 1238788 3.261 1241872
4 2.165 1241112 3.288 1245737
5 2.163 1247816 3.275 1254756
Ave. 2.168 1242924 3.284 1245555
SD 0.008 8200 0.016 8578
RSD [%] 0.357 0.660 0.485 0.689

Table 3   Reproducibility of measurement results obtained using parallel SFC system (modifier solvent: methanol, column: CHIRALPAK IA)

Number of injections Flavanone 1 Flavanone 2
tR [min] Peak area tR [min] Peak area
1 1.782 1272380 2.531 1270850
2 1.797 1266372 2.553 1272041
3 1.787 1262603 2.538 1264940
4 1.788 1249751 2.545 1253775
5 1.797 1256198 2.554 1263684
Ave. 1.790 1261461 2.544 1263684
SD 0.006 7867 0.009 6504
RSD [%] 0.330 0.624 0.346 0.514

Table 4   Reproducibility of measurement results obtained using parallel SFC system (modifier solvent: methanol, column: CHIRALPAK ID)

Number of injections Flavanone 1 Flavanone 2
tR [min] Peak area tR [min] Peak area
1 1.995 1240478 3.026 1244109
2 2.010 1251413 3.045 1253958
3 2.000 1238216 3.028 1241664
4 2.000 1218774 3.035 1234367
5 2.010 1236875 3.042 1241633
Ave. 2.003 1237151 3.035 1243146
SD 0.006 10520 0.007 6315
RSD [%] 0.300 0.850 0.246 0.508

For comparison, when the same measurements were carried out using the column-switching method, the total analysis time required to obtain four chromatograms was approximately 46 min, including the equilibration time for the columns. Therefore, in this measurement, the parallel method reduced the analysis time by more than a factor of ten. Also, although only two modifier solvents were used in the present case, increasing the number of solvents (up to 10) would lead to even greater speed advantages over the column-switching method.

About the Author

Chromatography Group